Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And that implication would be correct.
Probably all of them.
Writing about something, especially to express a neutral attitude in the matter, does not affiliate you with the thing being written about.
And that implication would also be correct - the guy calls himself David Pakman for fuck's sake. How stupid are you?
That doesn't mean everyone you obsessively found pictures of is necessarily and directly affiliated with the Gamergate movement. Until you find quotes of all of them saying without any ambiguity that they are without a doubt involved with Gamergate, you're still just spewing nonsensical, irrelevant verbal diarrhea in a shockingly bad attempt to lend credit to a shitty, toxic cause.
This is precisely why Gamergate is the laughing stock of the internet. It's because of complete morons like kaga that no one has to even consider the possibility that there's any amount of validity or sanity to this bullshit. It's nothing but a bunch of creepy, repressed nerds who don't have any other outlet for their obvious frustrations.
|
But PG, how is this thread where Kagatob posts pictures of women and decides based on their level of attractiveness whether or not they are intellectually viable at all indicative of his frustrations?