Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodybagger
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Back to my point you dodged... if you can't kill them at 20 what makes you think you can kill them at 40? or 50? Without great gear you will always die. They will always have better gear, and be on a better suited class for sniping kills, because they are dedicated to PVP. You admittedly don't want to engage in PVP so why are you here? To spectate PVP? To enjoy the PVP environment (which you obviously aren't)? I love PVP and actively seek PVP and hate twinks because I see no sport in it and prefer being the underdog... you hate twinks because they are the only people who actively kill people in sub 40 game play. You do not engage in PVP. That's the difference between us.
|
And to answer your question, I think there is clearly a difference between sub 20 pvp and afterwards. Despite being in rags a higher level caster will have access to a larger mana pool, mobility other utility tools and at least the potential to out dps standard fungi regen.
In the teens I was lucky to be able to off 5 casts. Each resist representing a loss of 20% of my total potential dps or utility.
Obviously, there is a difference between that situation and one in the 40s where you atleast have a larger tool box to work with and potential of doing some damage.
One situation, your effectively worthless in, the other you can atleast attempt to put up a fight.
You insist on claiming I don't like pvp when in reality its not being able to even be a factor that I dislike. At 49, I can atleast cast more than 5ish spells, I can root, shadowstep, have a wider range of dots to cast and access to jboots or other clickes.
But yes, continue to defend pvp where one party essetially fight back.