Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Love how BDA is defending against a lot of the same accusations they were throwing at class C guilds, and using the same arguments class C did. Anyone remember Taken saving BDA at naggy? Guess teaming up there is fine, just as long as you claim there wasn't an agreement before hand.
|
Other way around, and Taken didn't need saving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Given that class C was created because BDA didn't want to play the game the same way hard core guild do, it's ammusing that they're now the people trying to force others to play the game their way. The hard core guilds don't try to make rules that force people how to play, they just adapt to whatever rules are set. Sure, everyone lobbies for rules that benefit them, but the server is in the state it is because it has become common practice to respond to every casual cry and complaint about fairness by adding more rules under the guise of creating fairness. If this wasn't common practice, rule lawyering wouldn't be effective because it wouldn't be worth anyone's time. We're in this situation because of our willingness to alter rules to try and make everyone happy.
|
Class C was created because Rogean was tired of TMO/IB/FE shitting everything up for the whole server.
While Chest was vocal, every none TMO/IB/FE guild wanted changes that created segregation between the two playstyles.