It's not an A or B statement, it's an A AND B statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guineapig
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes but that doesn't benefit Karsten.
He wants more Russet or PoHate, not a robe.
|
Stated premise: Cryo robe doesn't benefit Karsten.
Unstated, but implied premise: Karsten only wants what benefits him.
Stated premise: LR satisfies him AND PoH satisfies him.
Unstated Conclusion: Both LR and PoH benefit Karsten
Conclusion follows logically from the premises you provided.
If he only wants what benefits him, and he wants LR back in game, then that implies that LR benefits him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guineapig
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As far as the benefit goes, not every member of his guild is geared up like he is so gearing up the guild could conceivably also benefit him in his quest to be more uber.
(I never said anything about a direct benefit...)
|
Actually you implied it, because cryo robe could benefit IB casters as well, yet you said he doesn't care about cryo robe. If he is happy with LR due to it benefiting his guild, they he'd also be happy about cryo robe due to it benefiting his guild. But you said he doesn't want cryo robe, SOOOOOOO he can't want LR just because it benefits his guild, according to you.
I want people to be accountable for the stupid things they say and not let them weasel out of it when cornered. It's the whole anti-hardcore mentality that is rampant among casual players here, saying some underhanded criticism of a person then backing down when called out. And that's exactly what you're doing. You made some snyde remark about someone only wanting what benefits them, then when called out you back down and try to change what you said.
Sincerely,
Guy with no classes to teach today and entirely too much time to kill