Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
firstly, wanna guess how many shits i give about what you think on how i conduct things? there are two people on this planet whose opinions matter to me when it comes to how i GM, and you're not either of them.
i like how you blame me for Hughman, and not the dumb asshole that was casting spells and forcing me to use DT in the first place, but ok fine. and i assume by special you mean so i can inform them of suspensions, get quicker follow up answers to petitions that require more info, and try to make myself available to watch over raids or large scale pvp, then yes. because i cant be in game 24 hrs a day, furthermore anyone that doesnt see the usefulness of that is an idiot. you might find this hard to believe, but some players actually want the staff around for large scale pvp, or just around to show a staff presence on the server.
as far as Colgate, youre the one with the hardon for the guy. i simply said "multiple guild leaders" (and last time i checked HC that was Gonhshow or Terp), and then you went on full retard on a multi hour Colgate rant.
and do answer your final question, youre being extremely fucking crazy. but i mean, if you're gonna make it this easy, i can literally do it all day long.
|
Not really you started off by calling me a player who has never broken a rule a toxic piece of shit. I pvp here every day i know for a fact that the state of pvp has actually degraded despite the increased pop. that's something only a player who actually goes out seeking pvp would know.
Sure there's a lot of 70 vs 20 scale fights for high end raid mobs lol if you consider that awesome dynamic pvp. Maybe your twisted and let puppies go after pitbulls and call that a fight too.
You asked for an example of how increased Gm presence could be negative I gave two. You asked for how a VIP Council could be bad, i showed how picking the wrong players could make it very bad. You know the kind of players who bindcamp, RMT, and train.
I think it's fine you made a mistake I always liked ya and sung your praises to everyone but lately nah i been seeing some unfair shit. And I'm the kind of person who speaks there mind when I know I'm right despite the repercussions because I don't break any rules and I should have the right to speak the truth.
If increased GM presence means deathtouch/ban first explain later, while taking the word of the first person to petition or the majority vote which will always be the largest guild then no I don't think increased GM presence will bode well on the servers population in the long run. And i have actual reasons to base that on it's not mindless tin foil hat shit when i can give actual examples.
If GM's in the future take the time to research something and give out fair judgement's on both sides of the fence then yea increased GM involvement could be a good thing, But i can only base that outcome on what I've seen of late and that's not whats been happening.