Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My favorite part of the graph is that it goes into great detail and breaks it all down by the types of degrees individuals have
|
Your point being that, on average, you suspect that women study in programs that are less important or less capable of providing the same level of income?
You feel that the stats are skewed by liberal arts degrees and womens' studies scholars?
Why do you hate women, Kagatob?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
how long they have been working at their perspective professions their starting salaries and how many times they've gotten raises/promotions.
|
So you're suggesting that the grandfathered in, undeniably patriarchal male dominated upper echelons of industry skewing these statistics are NOT a sign of existing gender bias effecting the current female workforce?
Why do you hate women, Kagatob?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But no, their general education level before even entering the workforce in the first place is king amirite?
|
The statistical flaw you're describing here effects both the Male and Female numbers, and thus - being subject to the same degree of error on each side - properly represents both sides relative to one another. You're correct in saying the numbers may not be saying much themselves, but the difference between the two sexes - given the same potential for error - certainly does.
Why do you hate women, Kagatob?
That's why they take an average.