? No it isn't.
Quote:
|
Throughout much of the twentieth century the Copenhagen interpretation had overwhelming acceptance among physicists. Although astrophysicist and science writer John Gribbin described it as having fallen from primacy after the 1980s,[34] according to a poll conducted at a quantum mechanics conference in 1997,[35] the Copenhagen interpretation remained the most widely accepted specific interpretation of quantum mechanics among physicists. In more recent polls conducted at various quantum mechanics conferences, varying results have been found.[36][37][38] Often, as is the case with the 4 referenced sources, the acceptance of the Copenhagen interpretation as the preferred view of the underlying nature was below 50% amongst the surveyed.
|
From wikipedia
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] but yknow. Best I could find.
The CI is very unsatisfying to a lot of people, because it just punts the deeper questions by saying 'it is not meaningful to talk about it'. It's an accurate reflection of QM itself, in that it is description only, with no underlying explanation.