Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is possible. What is the point that you are trying to illustrate? That altruism has a threshold based on relative wealth (i.e. You do not mind passing the lower valued items to someone else because it's value a insignificant compared to your total wealth) and/or you don't want to invest the time to sell lower value items in EC?
I can understand all of those attitudes, but that doesn't make NBG equitable. It just make you either a charitable, successful or lazy person ^^
The value of the item is inconsequential so long as it exists ( i.e. It can be traded)
|
That last is a statement of your position, not a given at all. All you're doing is illustrating the silliness of carrying any notion out to its (il)logical conclusion. "Principle" is the stupidest imaginable reason to ever do anything.
IOW, it's not uncommon for PUGs to NBG minor stuff and /ran the big(ger) ticket items, often decided on a case-by-case basis by the players involved at the time. It's not necessary to be bureaucratic about your social life.