Quote:
Originally Posted by webrunner5
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How did you EVER get the idea that a Ranger WAS a Tank??
If you go to the Class Discussions Forum on P1999 there is NO mention of a Ranger in the Tank section. I would think Nibog and friends know a thing or two about that. Nuff said.
They are in the Melee Forum. BIG difference. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
LOL, just fucking LOL. Seriously dude do you pay
any attention to how this game works? Ranger is a tank. A gimped tank, it's true, but still a tank. Ranger easily fills the tank role in a competent XP group, more easily than a Warrior on p99 where 99% of the players are idiots about agro management. My Cleric and Druid are happy to heal competent Ranger tanks, my Ranger would rather pull & dps but tanks just fine in regular group content. It doesn't matter what textures the model is painted with, it matters what abilities the class has. Rogue gets painted with the same texture as Ranger, but cannot tank worth a damn. Cleric gets painted with the same texture as Warrior/Paladin/SK but cannot tank well at all.