[Ele]

Originally Posted by Juntsie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Juntsie find it hard to believe that GM devote more time to petition process now than if petition process is approved and implemented. Juntsie not dispute dat GM spend large amount of time right now resolving unfortunate raid dispute (perhaps too much time - Juntsie support swift, in-game justice).

Do you have any experience with the current petition quest process? Please explain how a single petition thread with a total of 4 posts from the petitioner and petitionee would increase the work load of the GMs versus what current occurs?

But petition process stand to create large body of case-law that GM must reference to promote "consistent" ruling. It stand to promote lawyerquesting through painfully unclassic process. It take GM out of game and onto forum to review materials. Dis is painfully unclassic and against spirit of game and dis project.

This already happens.

What next? Appeal process?

Already happens.

Petition to Rogean for Review process?

Already happens.

Supplemental briefing?

Already happens.

Amicus briefing?

Already happens.

NOT CLASSIC. Juntsie again tink dat lawyerquest need bash in face.

This or another process would bash the current lawyerquest in the face. Rather than spending 1-5 hours a day talking to raid leaders via Skype and having out of game chat conversations, any dispute will have to be addressed in a single go with everything on the table and in the public eye.