Quote:
Originally Posted by Juntsie
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why shuld GM devote so much time and resource to public petition process dat benefit only minute, tiny amount of players who after multiple years cannot seem to figure out how to share tings and bash together for fun? Just cuz said players have longest neck beards, desire most pixilz, and cry loudest, does not mean dat dey should be given undue consideration or expect dat staff will review petitions pursuant to lawyerquest legal procedures.
Such consideration should not be given. Burden is not equitable or gud for volunteer GMs, who stand to turn into magistrate petition review robots. It not gud for server. Forced equitable rotation may not be classic but it much lesser evil dan current silly rules, laughable disputes, and proposed burdensome petition process. If dis objectionable, justice shuld be otherwise be swift, based on simple undisputed facts, and executed in-game, classic style.
|
Take it up with the GMs, then. We, as the players, can only work within the confines that they present us. We have been explicitly told, many times, that full rotations and completely hands-off GMing are not options. We have only two choices. Keep the system as it is, or modify the current system to be more efficient.
It is absurd that we'd not opt to make a bad system better when it's the only one we've got.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]