[Juntsie]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well GMs and owner of the server have said that forced rotations will not happen, so it is up to the community and GMs to figure out how to mediate disputes.

It seems you agree that the current system of closed petitions is broken and in need of a fix. How are the volunteer GMs already not magistrate petition review robots? They choose to devote more hours per week right now handling petitions than some people work.

Juntsie find it hard to believe that GM devote more time to petition process now than if petition process is approved and implemented. Juntsie not dispute dat GM spend large amount of time right now resolving unfortunate raid dispute (perhaps too much time - Juntsie support swift, in-game justice). But petition process stand to create large body of case-law that GM must reference to promote "consistent" ruling. It stand to promote lawyerquesting through painfully unclassic process. It take GM out of game and onto forum to review voluminous petition materials. Dis is painfully unclassic and against spirit of game and dis project.

What next when lawyerquesters still whine about resolution and accuse GM of crap? Amicus briefing? Supplemental briefing? Motion for Petition Reconsideration? Notice of Petition Appeal Process before 3-GM Panel? Petition for Discretionary Review by Supreme Court of Rogean?

NOT CLASSIC.

Juntsie again tink dat lawyerquest need bash in face. Dis is 20 year old game dat supposed to be about bashing, eatting tings, and drinking tings for fun. Therefore, Juntsie advise all to not take raid dispute so seriously. Classic GM did not. Only time did when involve exploits - WHAT DAT? EXPLOIT WARDER ON Z-AXIS?! BAN GUILD, ROFLZZZZZZZ.