Quote:
Originally Posted by sox7d
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"How one thinks the game should be played" has nothing to do with it. If you're in a game where the only thing keeping someone from playing for an ~hour stretch of sitting on their ass bored is that you want a tiny bit of experience, you're selfish aka an asshole.
And don't give me the "They're not mean, they just derive fun from efficiency!" bullshit. No. Everyone wants to be efficient. They probably won't leave the group for a better class to replace themselves for the sole purpose of it making the group more efficient. The derive fun from efficiency for their own self-interest, often at the expense of others given the scarcity and often unsoloable nature of the game. They'd rather see someone unable to play than sacrifice a tiny bit of experience, that's what makes them an asshole, but you can call that a "play style" if you'd like.
|
"And don't give me the "They're not mean, they just derive fun from efficiency!" bullshit." Why exactly is this bullshit? That's exactly what it is for me. I'm a min/max'er and that's part of the fun of the game for me. I couldn't possibly care less if you like it or not. I would've preferred to make my shaman an iksar but I went troll cause JBB is really important to my class imo. Others think I'm insane cause the appearance of their character and what they think looks better is more important to them. More power to them but that's not what's important to me. Guess I'm an asshole
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let me ask you this. If your group already has a cleric and there's a cleric LFG nearby are you an asshole for not wanting 2 clerics in your group? Clerics can't solo well man! Obviously you're a dick if you don't invite every class that can't solo to your group whenever they're LFG in your area right?
TL;DR "You view/play the game differently than I do. Hence you are an asshole" - sox7d