[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thats like saying the point of movies is to be unrealistic.

The point of video games are to be video games.. if you arnt bothered by naked chicks fighting dragons, then you arnt going to be bothered by normal chicks fighting dragons..

hell as an adult, you may even play more games in that case.

Anita challenges game devs, that doesn't mean she is god and creating rules that say games have to be one way.. she calls people out for being dipshits.

and there are a lot of dipshits in the video game industry... especially big budget AAA games, which are her primary targets...

Arguing that games that take women seriously because they are trying to tell a real interactive story, are not better than a game that is trying to tell an interactive story about men saving chicks in bikini's is like saying that 2001 isnt a better film than You've got Mail...

And if the film industry agree's that 2001 is a better flim than Grownups 2, doesn't mean that people arnt going to make Grownups 2.. if you like that shit, someones going to make it.

Anita just wants the AAA games to be looked at more critically. Because she, like many other gamers, wants better games.

As far as gamergate goes, by simply reading the posts of the people here who support it, you can see that they make up their entire argument form start to finish, with accusations about what gamergate is, by just making up their own news stories - like X spelt with Y for good reviews, even when it never happened.

the gamergate movment is 100% delusional children.

So what you're saying is what I already assumed. There is zero point for either side expending this much energy on this crap. Because it isn't actually going to change anything in a substantive way.