The problem with picking a GM from the player base is they are innately biased from the onset and would make all the tin foil hatters go bezerk with theories.
The problem with not picking a player based GM is he(or she) won't have the understanding of what's going on and make bad calls (call in the tin foilers after said bad calls).
Now: If you got an unassociated gm who never showed his face and was an arsehole fgt and banned said known rule breakers the moment they break rules I.e: rmt = goodbye; 1 month suspension across all accounts for training; boxing= goodbye; etc etc
A gm who spends x amount of time weekly/montly looking at the "known" fgts on server I.e once a month checks Sektorz for rmt (coz guy is doing it atm an everyone knows it Mr 400kpp wtb list/vibrating gloves) I.e checks lite/bstagor/x-y-z person for boxing buff toons etc. -Disclaimer: All the above mentioned persons are just an example of suspect people and their crimes - You'd soon find that more then not people will fall in to line a bit better.
You cannot beat a bunch of fgt nerds with a tea party scheme; you have to hit them where it hurts and that is with perma bans and loooooong suspensions.
Then you have people like Aussie/Durebael etc doing CSR work..... Problems solved.
|