[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If Christ believed in an afterlife, and if he knew slaves rebelling against their masters would simply be murdered, why wouldn't he advise them to submit to bondage? Why did MLK not advise blacks to fight in a bloody rampage against whites. Practicality is always lost on you idiots. Slave revolts never work.

Christ advised the obedience of slaves. That's 1000x better of a strategy than anything you dip shits could come up with. Ask Spartacus or Nat Turner.

Ah yes, what a strategy indeed! He was working in the best interest of the slaves, of course! Oh, and just to be sure it seemed authentic, there's a bit about how it's okay to beat slaves within an inch of their lives - and if they die, no big deal, the slaves are our property after all. No worries, it's all part of the strategy. It has to be practical, right?

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

However, if you assume the moral high ground, people generally, as an introspective reaction, tend to see the evil in their ways.

Completely baseless assertion. People who assume the moral high ground because they think they have god on their side are the people who end up rationalizing things like bigotry, slavery, and genocide.

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's immoral to follow any teaching, because existing is immoral.

This is a complete non-argument and not even worth addressing. Warfare is necessary to kill people like Hitler who want to exterminate entire ethnic populations. The fact that every human being has a carbon footprint doesn't make every human being immoral. What a waste of a thought.

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only "religion" that scares me is this incessant desire from liberals and atheists to silence anyone who has a different opinion. What a fucked up world we'd have if you guys had the power to create a society without diversity of opinion, culture or thought.

More nonsensical confusion of religion and irreligion, and also not really even worth addressing. This is the typical non-thinking religious reaction to having their shitty, immoral beliefs challenged: "You just want to silence everyone that doesn't agree with you!" No, us challenging you does not mean we're trying to silence you. Get over yourself.

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh, and there are plenty of countries that have thought police apparatuses. I suggest you move to Iran, China, or Russia; you'd all fit in perfectly. Drones following the queen like in every other hive.

And speaking of societies without diversity of opinion, culture or thought, have you looked at Iran lately? Have you looked at North Korea? Do you know what a theocratic dictatorship is? Did you know that this is what religion created?