View Single Post
  #75  
Old 10-07-2014, 12:04 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
An actual King 'group' of 6 people would kill everything in the jail, brain room, and pull shrooms. What does it matter if 3 people claim the camp and don't feel like killing the other mobs they're entitled to? It's their right to choose which mobs they kill and which they don't for whatever reason. Just because they aren't touching them doesn't mean that someone else is should be entitled to them.
That is their right not to kill mobs, until another group wants to come in and kill those unclaimed intermediate mobs. The first group has a decision: do they want to start clearing them or let the other group clear the untouched mobs. If the king group does not want to clear the intermediate mobs between King and tube room, then they will have to take special precautions on their pull to not train the group now clearing jail.

Quote:
What are you actually upset about here? If a full group of 6 people claiming king were only killing the king, would that be a problem? What if they camped out in the zone out room and only killed those 3 mobs + king. Would you care if they were killing all the mobs, yet still pulled to the tube room? What if it were 5 people? 4? Where do you draw the line over what is an acceptable amount players that can enjoy the same content for whatever purpose and which mobs you require them kill?
It is not a problem, until another group wants to come in and kill the other mobs being ignored.

Using this logic, a shaman soloing Hiero can prevent another group from killing the rest of crypt just because the shaman could kill the other stuff but chooses not to. A solo/group socking Tranix can prevent people from killing FGs just because they could kill it but choose not to.