Quote:
Originally Posted by runlvlzero
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I guess further athiesm imlplies the complete disbelief of something just because it is not scientific.
Thats pretty dumb. It's mechanical. And thoughtless.
|
Not disbelief because it is unscientific but because it has no evidence to support it. No one is claiming science knows everything. There are plenty of things outside the human scope of knowledge.
Ask yourself, "What has been the most reliable method for answering questions about the universe?". Do you have a better method?
"Thats pretty dumb. It's mechanical. And thoughtless."
Says the guy typing on a computer produced by the very methodology he is slamming. How many monks does it take to invent a microwave?
"But no one is willing to pull their heads out their asses and take the leap from cynisism to true skeptisism"
Ughh, you do know what peer review is and why it exists, right? Scientists are skeptics to the absolute core. Are you being skeptical about your own beliefs? You certainly are acting like you alone have the answers.