Quote:
Originally Posted by RobotElvis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
....
|
"I
feel was in the context of what I believe. And I know your semantic argument on believe and faith so whatever."
There is that word again.
"This is a logical deduction I haveade based on the evidence of the natural world around me."
Logic deductions are not scientific. Is it logical that an atom can exist in more than one place as shown in the double slit experiment? Think of an experiment to prove creationism and conduct it. Only then will you gain foothold. It shouldnt be too hard to get some of the mega-churches in this country and around the world to fund this research.
"Design is appera by and immutable to the natural world they even have a scientific field called: biomimetics."
Yes, we study what billions of years of selection by natural forces has produced and mimic the engineering. The reason it appears designed is because nature has selected for beneficial traits and discarded the bad. I in no way see how that proves a Creator.
"There are no stars or nebulae that had to struggle through trial and error, natural selection to reach their present form."
Stars and nebulae do not struggle. They did not go through a trial and error process either. They follow the laws of nature we observe...nothing more, nothing less. I have no idea what you are trying to say here so I will leave it at that.
"A speck of dust has approximately 3t atoms, depending on its mass. Just think about how complex atoms are."
Complexity does not equate a creator. I dont know why you keep inferring this with zero evidence to support it. Oh, I know...feelings. To quote Pink Floyd "showing feelings...of an almost human nature. This will not do!"
"That is a non biological molecule that cannot be naturally selected by trial and error or natural pressure."
Molecules form different compounds
naturally. Different environments and different molecules form different compounds. The system that describes that process is NOT natural selection. Natural selection has nothing to do with it.
Natural selection applies to living organisms not matter. It is a term used to describe how an environment either rewards a biological trait or squashes it. A molecule is not living and it doesnt have genetic traits therefor it would be idiotic to think natural selection applies to it.