Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it's about having neutral and unbiased content as much as possible. neither side in gamergate is going to be cited as a scholar on the topic. i sincerely doubt wikipedia has any desire to host a description of that "event" at all.
again, this is how wikipedia has operated for years. they've removed postings both negative and positive related to all sorts of criminal events, including pedophiles.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you on gamergate because I don't care, I'm trying to tell you that wikipedia is not interested in taking a side. At all.
|
That's fair I guess.
I find the whole thing interesting, not only because I hate SJWs with a passion, but I've hated gaming journalism since 2002, couple that with the fact that the last game I legit enjoyed was Minecraft... I want to see a change in gaming.
It's not limited to the journalistic aspect, it's about the disconnect between gamers and the developers.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fixing development can't happen until after the journalism aspect is addressed IMO.