Thread: religion
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 09-20-2014, 03:33 PM
leewong leewong is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one said it does, it was along with the religion definition because, like I already said (please stop just reading what you want to read in posts), one of you already pointed out how scientists don't have a "belief", so I gave the definition of belief and faith, to remove any middle-ground argument BS that having belief is only to have a belief in the supernatural blah blah blah or that faith is only prevalent in the supernatural or blah blah blah.
You accuse me of reading what I want to see but then in the same post assume I share the same beliefs as a previous poster. You arent cutting out any middle man. You are propping up straw men and knocking them down.

Please tell me how was your posts on definitions even remotely relevant to my previous post explaining the scientific method? Also, please answer my original question posted in the same post. How do you consider the scientific method as I posted "religious"?