Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Quixote
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Holy fuck. Is everyone else reading this?
I'm pretty sure at this point that you're just trolling because I have a hard time believing that anyone's reading comprehension is that poor. But I'll give you some quick answers just in case it is.
The definition of supernatural that you gave works for the most part. Anything outside of the realm of the natural world is supernatural. A creator god would have to be outside of the natural world, else he or she couldn't create it.
Science only deals with the natural world, so no, scientific theories cannot be supernatural because the supernatural lies outside the realm of science. Which is why science makes no claim about gods, ghosts, goblins or spooks. Having said that, there are pseudo-sciences that do make that claim, so I understand the confusion.
Hell, science does god-like things now. Or at least it would appear so to a person a couple of centuries ago.
As to whether you agree with me or not, honestly I'm expecting you not to. That matters to me not a whit. What does matter is that I make a well reasoned argument, which is difficult given that the material that you've left me to work with is rife with non-sequiturs and confoundedly poor logic. But I like a challenge. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
One question though:
Are you yet another one who believes that all scientists sit in labs using nothing but a Ouija board and a pair of dice or maybe some mouse entrails to create scientific theories? |
So, your implication is that the definition of supernatural is only relevant whenever science claims its relevant or not.
I would ask if you are one of those people that spam about reading comprehension whenever someone disagrees with you, but you already made that answer obvious.
I don't think scientists do that, and in fact have not even once in this thread claimed that god is the all mighty. I have simply provided logic to your guys argument which usually results in angry responses that I just don't get it, when there is no grey areas or not understanding the definitions and facts that I have provided. You are the one to claim that things that things without any real proof are true while claiming religious views are without a doubt 100% fabricated, which is the same idea as a theory.
Let me ask you a question, are you one of those people that feels because shitty things happen, or you personally are such a piece of shit that God must not exist, because if he did, this stuff wouldn't happen? Because there is NO scientific evidence at all to prove God doesn't exist, matter of fact, there is more scientific theories that would point to the possibility than not just from logical thinking.