Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I thought I stated it quite plainly several times. The theory of evolution is a religion. It does not encompass all science and all science does not require it. I respect the work of scientists,even those who are proponents of evolution. But I realize that it is a form of scientific interpretation, not science itself. Therefore I reject the interpretation of scientific findings into evolutionary terms.
Do you feel that there would be no science in any form without the theory of evolution?
|
No, of course not. Science existed long before scientists started realizing that biological organisms evolved. Having said that, I can't think of any science that exists in a vacuum, or any that aren't connected to other scientific fields in some way.
I asked that specific question because many sciences contribute to or depend on evolutionary theory. Biology and anthropology for example. I asked medical questions because that science also contributes to, and is dependent on evolutionary theory.
I suppose I'm just trying to get my head around how you decide which of the fields of science are indeed "science" and which fields are just made up stuff.