Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The burden of proof is on you to show that the $150,000 Anita received was spent as intended. Spent to fund her research for her youtube videos. The 5 youtube videos she's made over the past two years at $30,000 a pop. That's on you buddy.
|
That's absurd. The burden of proof is on the one making the allegation. Until proven otherwise, one must assume she spent the money as intended. Otherwise, we'd be living under a "guilty until proven innocent" system.
__________________
Gnawlunzs Phrogphry
Master Angler, Baker, Cadger, Drunk
"If you can't eat a frog, then eat two."