Quote:
Originally Posted by Hokushin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think it would be wise for GM enforcing on OOA kills considering there is a much more valuable option for the server with people working together, perhaps there is some alternative proposal everyone can agree on that doesn't add excessive rules, or add to the GMs plates of things they have to deal with.
|
GM enforced punishment is a requirement for some guilds to sign this agreement. This was necessitated from the fall out of the last agreement. If there is no enforcement, there really is no point of an actual agreement, as any guild at any time can just blow it up for whatever reason they see fit.
GMs have volunteered to enforce this agreement so I suspect that they don't see it requiring much effort since all infractions would be pretty clear and penalties have already been laid out.
If, however, it is true that only three Overseers can be up at one time (this is still disputed), then it would make sense to have an exception for allowing the killing the oldest overseer when a fourth is ready to be added rather than negating penalties entirely. The only way we are really going to find out if this is true or not is for everyone to agree not to kill any Overseers until there are 3 up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also, don't repops (non-earthquake) despawn all the additional OOA's?
|
They only despawn when there is a server reset or the zone crashes. Earthquakes just add a new noble and reset the noble timer.