Quote:
Originally Posted by Secrets
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You just have to categorize people differently than black and white thinking. Merge all the gender terms into one umbrella term, trans, and all the sexual deviancy terms into another term, sexuality.
Much like sexuality and gender are separate, these are two different umbrellas. The only reason why trans folk get merged into gay communities are due to the terminology made famous in 1970's (LGBT), when transgender issues were not exactly defined but were 'similar enough to the masses' to be lumped in with gays.
It's an easy way of looking at it that causes no confusion. A crossdresser who does something for sexual deviancy is in the realm of sexuality, while a crossdresser who does something because it makes them feel accepted is a trans issue.
|
Except it's not that simple any more with this entire spectra of genderqueer that has become popular in the last five years thanks to tumblr.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Secrets is the one that is worthwhile to humanity. Runlvlzero is a waste of space.
|
This is a much easier method. Thanks.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]