Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Raid rules say that guilds may only have 2 representatives at a spawn.
|
do you admit that this rule was not broken? y/n?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Additional Raid rules FAQ defines a "Raid" as any group of players unite in the common goal of killing a particular mob at a particular time.
|
that's nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is no question that here BDA unilaterally united with Taken in their goal of killing naggy. So, the raid rules would consider them a raid.
|
this is where your logic falls apart. you simply assume that it was BDAs goal to unite with Taken. there's nothing to prove your claim. how do you know that it wasn't simply their goal to punch the mob that they had just spent 16 hours socking independent of the success of Taken? at that point, it's not a joint raid, it's a Taken raid (the one that had FTE) and a BDA raid that had conceded the mob to Taken and decided to just have a little fun at the end. and then TMO cried.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Whether or not you broke the rules depends upon whether or not the 2 tracker limit applies to Raids.
|
who cares, it was two separate guilds and it was two separate raids.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
GM's apparently have said so in the past (FE/IB).
|
who cares about this, either. FE and IB were clearly an alliance that split their loot. there was no split in the loot between taken and BDA because they're not an alliance and weren't working together.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It makes complete sense that it would apply in cases like this.
|
only if it fits the TMO agenda, amirite?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
BDA's punishment was fair.
|
no it's not, it was unfounded and needs to be overturned and any rule against hitting another raids target without disrupting their raid needs to be fixed before velious comes out because people will be tagging tormax/dain/yelinak kills for faction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But as others have said here, I think its not fair at all the BDA would be reprimanded in an incident like that
|
lol, fake sympathy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yet GM's look the other way after blatant disruption here by Catherine
|
only truthful thing in your post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
fresh out of her suspension for auto fire.
|
and then you go back to posting dumb shit