[Godefroi]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

since TMO gets their kicks from denying loot to anyone but themselves, this is a win for them since the loot was destroyed. That is why they aren't petitioning. That is why umbrella isn't harassing the GMs on facebook or Skype to change the ruling.

This dude Unbrella stalked the GMs for 2 months after the FFA Naggy incident to get a new ruling. Sirken had already ruled that there was no raid interference and everyone went about their business till 2 months later Unbrella got Derubael to re-evaluate the situation. For those not in the know, Nagafen was engaged by Taken and was being killed - they had Naggy down to 20% and had 30 people engaged. They were in no danger of wiping, but a few BDA people got on the encounter log at the end. There was no collusion between Taken and BDA on the kill and BDA received no compensation whatsoever. Since both BDA and Taken had trackers present before the mob popped, however, TMO said there was a violation and said they were denied a dragon somehow. SO they petitioned to get Sirken's ruling overturned. TMO wanted a dragon from Taken and BDA. BDA offered to not go for the next FFA Naggy.

Somehow, thru litigation, BDA got suspended from their next rotated class R Naggy (ridiculous). TMO didn't get a dragon, Taken kept the loot. Mind you, there was no fraps submitted to prove anything. TMO says they somehow didn't have fraps of this incident (not likely, big fat liars) and the other guilds thought the incident was behind them since sirken had already ruled no violation so they didn't keep their fraps.

tldr, Unbrella = scum of the earth. BDA loses a rotated class R dragon for a ffa "violation".

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]