the taken/sev situation had nothing to do with BDA (or as much to do with BDA as every other guild there), which is why it's so confusing that we were being singled out on sirken's stream.
the bda nagafen debacle has nothing to do with this
there's no parallel to bda's raid interference with draco because we didn't kill it, thus the warning. in the sev situation, taken did kill it (which is why the assumption would be a suspension)
someone can correct me if i'm wrong, but the summary of why people (i mean shit, there were TMO and BDA members agreeing with each other in RnF yesterday) are upset about this is:
taken's loot being revoked isn't a punishment because they broke the rules to get it. they had no right to kill or loot, according to the rules.
any of the guilds there could have decided to kill steal Severilous,
but,
every other guild there was working under the assumption that killing a raid target without without FTE would lead to harsh punishment (regardless of the circumstances, i.e. Sirken's "respect the FTE" commandment), because that's how it's been ruled in the past almost every single time
taken ignored the rules that everyone else were playing by
...
we understand the rulings are up to interpretation and we appreciate the time you guys donate to this project. none of us really care about the dragon loot. it's jsut one of those.. what's the point of playing a game if the game doesn't have rules? sorta things. the FTE meta game is all we have to live for!
__________________
Grew | Stable | Doub | Bubb | Locust
|