[arsenalpow]

If someone gets DQed they're done. That was established with Dolj in Hate. Again, the main issue I think most people have is lack of consistency.

Week 1 of the new raiding agreement everything was pretty vague, BDA took a 2 week suspension at Trak for being "too close" which was the vaguest thing ever since it was never defined. BDA took suspension over that Naggy, IB took a suspension at draco but not at Fay. AG took a suspension when the system failed to record lockouts (but they should have known?) The point is NOTHING has been consistent.

I appreciate a logical non black and white system, logic should be used to interpret the situation. An example would that FE wizard that got FTE on CT right before TMO engaged it while the FE raid force had no intention of engaging and only wanted to abuse the FTE mechanic for loot. That was rightfully awarded to TMO. Or a decision I disagreed with, Taken wiping to Fay, kiting it around for 10 minutes, BDA pulling completely unaware that it was still aggroed by a Taken member, killing the mob, only to have the loot awarded to Taken when there was a 10 minute delay between Taken "FTE" and BDA being on the hate list. These are two entirely different situations but I'm just illustrating the range of rulings I've seen. I know TMO or IB could illustrate plenty of unsatisfactory VP rulings.

The one rule above all others is FTE, you don't kill what you don't FTE. Catherin willfully brought that mob to TT, and your guild willfully engaged it. I'm not looking for a pound of flesh, I'm looking for a consistent ruling and this ruling is so far from that. It's hard for me to stomach knowing that BDA is under suspension for almost the same thing and Taken in an even more blatant act isn't.