View Single Post
  #17  
Old 10-14-2010, 11:53 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DekThai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think warriors are ineffective as well. I had played cleric, bard and necro and I mean all you have to do is pushing couple of buttons just like warriors.

No matter what class you played, you do require teamwork and trust me, playing warrior class does required leadership and high level of collaboration in any situation. It's more than you know really if you ever play one.
First of all you can't possibly compare the range of options available to a Bard to those of a warrior.

Secondly in my post I clearly said:

Quote:
Now, I'm not saying there's no skill involved in being a warrior. Just that the concept behind the class tends to attract more mouth breathers than people who are actually intelligent or good at the game.
It probably takes more skill to tank as a warrior at certain levels because they don't have things like disease cloud to help them with aggro. It's just that so many idiots roll warriors (for reasons I mentioned) so warriors tend to seem like shitty tanks.

If I were more convinced that you could level really quickly as a warrior I might roll one, but they just cost so much money to gear up.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis