Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Use your best judgement" isn't really the best way to go about making new rules is it? Rules should be specific and allow for little player interpretation, or else you'll end up spending more time trying to enforce the vague rule than you ever did on the few scammers.
The point I was trying to get at is that all the things I listed were in essence the same. If you ban casinos (people using /random to take a chance at winning money/item), you have to ban rolling on loots as well. If you try to ban one without banning the other, you'll have to twist your logic to fit the inconsistency. I suspect this is why you say you want to leave it up to us, because there is no way you can be specific about what is allowed and what isn't without exposing that inconsistency.
|
You're an idiot and being difficult.
They are banning casinos due to scammers. End of discussion .
Be mad at the pathetic humans in existence who scam other people over pixels, and move on.