Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sure someone said the same thig about being forces to allow blacks to use the same bathrooms as whites 40 years ago.
Basically your just trying to imagine a world where civil rights is not constantly moving forward for a free and equal place for all people.
Hate to break it to you but your just an old man in a new world.
In other words you trippin if you think that any of that is negative. if your looking for chilling shit look to the police department in ferguson. You got a lot worse shit happening there.
|
You are still completely missing the point. This is not about civil rights for gays, or any other group. This is about freedom of association. The case we are using as an example was about forcing a baker to make a cake for a celebration. Not because they were gay, but because they were celebrating an event. He did not refuse service because they were gay. He refused service because he did not agree with the celebration they were conducting.
Being a specific color is not equivalent to practicing a specific action. They are entirely different. Your continued attempts to compare the two are growing old. They are not the same.
I cannot help but notice you have completely ignored the idea of compelled speech when I explained it to you. I take it by your omission, which is a form of speech, that you are telling me that you are fine with the government telling people how to vote, or which charities they should donate to, or which businesses they should not shop at? If this sounds dystopian that's because it is. You are literally defining a police state.
You're okay with it, and that scares the hell out of me.