Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's one of the flaws with the two party system. Balls to the wall or nothing instead of simple option 3. For example.
Gay marriage bans are wrong no matter what way you look at it, however at the same token, forcing priests to perform marriages against the will of their belief system is also wrong. If any of these lawmakers had a lick of sense, they'd allow the individual churches to decide whether or not they would allow same-sex marriages. The issue is the politicians who have money in it one way or the other so either side has much less gain if you make that sweet middle ground.
You'll have to be more specific but either way banning any kind of weapon should be considered unconstitutional (You should be able to purchase a rocket launcher, AAA gun, Tanks, Planes etc.) and gun-free zones absolutely don't work. This is coming from a social progressive who has never owned/fired a gun mind you. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know next to nothing about the nuances of casino issues since I don't gamble but am not anti-gambling. I do know from experience with the casinos (I think Trump?) recently wanted to set up in Western Mass, that it should be up to the individual districts and by extension the local voter populace, to decide whether or not they want to allow it, no different than deciding about an amusement park, movie theater, shopping mall etc.. |
So who of those is being oppressive and who is being oppressed?
I would agree with those points personally, but the guy down the street who doesn't agree has just as much say in matters as we do.