Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What details are verified exactly? Almost none, and making a decision in such a state of ignorance requires one to rely on faith/emotion, which is a poor way for intelligent beings to behave. You are a prisoner to emotional arguments, such as the "unarmed man" argument that has been prevalent lately. An unarmed man can pose just as much of a threat as an armed one. There is not a single self defense law in the US that requires a person is protecting themselves from an armed aggressor only.
Yes, there are a lot of IFs out there because there is a great deal about this that is not yet known. I'm giving possible reasons why you should withhold judgment. I am well aware of the extreme state of ignorance all of us are in regarding the situation, and urging you to not make a decision one way or the other until all the facts are out. And if you bother reading the rest of this thread (not really recommended as it's long and boring mostly), you'd see I do the same to people who have already determined Mr. Brown to be guilty of assault and the cop completely innocent.
|
Not once did I say whether one party was guilty or not. I said I don't see how, with the details that have been released, that the shooting was justified. We do have some details to work with here.
All I said for sure was that this is going to become a statistic and people are going to use the emotional leverage it generates for their own ends and that bums me out. Also, that it is a tragedy, which is true regardless of what outcome occurs.