Quote:
Originally Posted by DetroitVelvetSmooth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fat sissy follows black kid, calls cops who tell him to stop it, continues following kid, walks up to kid and starts questioning him (I'm sure in a very nonthreatening and professional manner), somehow a fight breaks out (no way!), then the fat sissy who had been hiding a gun the whole time loses the fight, fat sissy shoots kid fulfilling a lifelong dream of getting back at those black kids in high school that picked on him. What did I miss?
|
1) the cops didn't tell him anything, an operator did
2) according to zimmerman, martin came out of the bushes and initiated the confrontation
3) even if someone questions you unprofessionally and threateningly, you don't have the right to punch them in the face and bash their head against the sidewalk
4) the fact that you say "somehow a fight breaks out" is pretty much all that was needed to acquit -- that's called reasonable doubt
5) "a fight" is a bit of a misnomer. zimmerman was getting pummeled, martin's knuckles were a little worse for the wear
6) you attribute long-standing racial enmity to zimmerman despite significant evidence that he was not a racist and actually served as a mentor to a black youth
you don't have to like zimmerman. he's a fat sissy, sure. his actions contributed to a truly unfortunate death. but according to his story, which is largely corroborated by available evidence, the only thing he's guilty of is being an idiot. there's not even close to sufficient evidence to convict him of murder. he shouldn't have even been charged if not for the cause célèbre