Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardalicious
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why is everyone assuming this? I can understand in the case of someone trying to steal back an account they sold years ago. I could even understand in the case of someone trying to claim they owned accounts attached to an eqemu account someone else owned if they hadn't actively used them.
But these two accounts were ones that I had been actively using and logging into up until a month or so ago when Cloki managed to password reset them and take them over from me. In the first two cases, it would be easy to see that the person trying to reclaim/steal the accounts hadn't had access to them in a long, long time via IP addresses. And in MY case, it was obvious I DID have access to them up until Cloki SMS reset the passwords and started playing them himself.
How would it set the worst possible precedence in this situation?
|
Because you're not a unique snowflake. If you were to get your way it would lead to one of two things.
A) they split off your cleric/bard, you live happily ever after and the staff says this was a one time deal never again. Cries of favoritism ring out from the heavens and all the jimmies in the world are simultaneously rustled
B) they split off your cleric/bard, you live happily ever after and the staff sets precedence for this to happen for other players. Each situation would have to be investigated thoroughly to determine legitimacy of each claim. Massive amounts of man hours would be wasted investing frivilous claims, Sirken would eventually hang himself in a closet while Derubael goes for the quick gunshot to the temple.
Or, and stick with me on this,
they could do nothing and avoid both of the previously mentioned scenarios because you should have never given up the emu you idiot after staff said from beginning that they do not condone or fix issues concerning account sales.