Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekrul
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its generous? He stole his fucking account.
|
After reading the first half of Pans transcript (putting things into perspective), I'd say he's in the right technically and see why the GM's are ignoring the issue. imo it's false advertisement, the seller should have mentioned that it was a 'shared account'. The emu account imo is a single account, and you get to make three sub accounts attached to that. And that being to the original buyer, and then passed to yet another buyer, Pan. Technically, the seller goofed big time, and I don't see as having any real claim to the account. I don't see it as "stole".
But then if originally advertised as a 'shared account' I don't even see how that would make a difference, especially with the chance it could be sold again. That is just the gamble that the seller took, rolled and lost, for a few plats. Roll a new cleric, stop trying to get the accounts banned.
/thread