Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilMcKracken
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This seems less likely compared to the training to ZO explanation I gave, or compared to Player A holds the camp player B wants, player B grabs a huge train and runs them past Player A who is pulling mobs back to his camp and gets hit by something. Player B then FD's and lets player A die and claims it was his own fault because social agro and he should of camped out and the camp is now his. Which is more a dick in the situation? Id go with my option. Either way all the above examples are dumb as hell. The game is flawed bottom line because in any situation you are going to have exploits or people will find exploits. It just falls under you are responsible for what you are pulling and don't be a dick and don't do something intentionally.
|
Honestly your scenario wasn't clear to me, it sounded like the person zoned out, then another player ran into his mobs (after he was already zoned out), and blamed him? Confusing shit.
The things you don't seem to get is that this unlikely situation of negligence, while "unlikely", is exactly what IB did. They ran their mob through a bunch of shit, then stood there, died, and petitioned blaming the other guild getting them suspended. It's insane.