Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure class-c have been the ones asking for this while class-r was defending auto-fire.
|
orly?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Striiker
Proposal (enhances competition and mobilization without rewarding those camped or bound in the zone):
1) Trackers can't engage targets. Leave maximum at two trackers. The is more competitive as you not only need to get a force in zone, you need to zone in your tagger. Let the trackers only track.
2) No more grabbing FTE with pets / summoned eyes, etc.
3) Members of guilds camped in the zone or active in the zone must leave the zone before being involved in the engage. (to combat people bound in the zone, all must enter via a zone line or a group port).
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Snackies
Proposal #1 Thoughts:
From a C guild standpoint, selecting what class combinations that track/engage based on who's available is part of getting that edge over the competition. It's also not always feasable to field these ideal combinations where another guild might be able to, resulting in having to wait longer for an engage to be possible. Tracker class selection tactics are used for other raid targets such as Trakanon (mage trackers that are ready to CoTH to give them an edge, for example).
|
Looks to me like Class R proposed this first and Class C defended the use of FTE trackers and thus autofire.
Turns out you're not the visionary you thought you were, Unbrella.
Feel free to peruse the original post here:
http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=139118