[Kekephee]

Or, you know, one of his points.


It seems to me that he's really taking more of a Malthusian stance here than anything- that if a group, a race, a geographical tribe, whatever, doesn't fit within an evolutionary schema and is wiped out or reduced if they don't adapt or move, that that's not racism, it's nature.


I don't agree with it with regards to the human race in the 21st century, but I think that's his point, and I don't think it's inherently racist. I also think it doesn't apply to Africa because as someone else pointed out, the factors over there are things like warlords, educational clusterfucks, and civil wars, not natural camouflage or the ability to hunt a certain prominent species found within the area.