Quote:
Originally Posted by Fountree
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Um maybe. I'm not sure what you need answering specifically, there's alot there and I answered some in my original post. Again, as I already stated I don't think a lot of people had a problem with the majority of the FE membership they just had a problem with how the merge was internally forced, as well as a lot of the issues I've discussed on guild direction and the choice of putting friends over pixels. Remember, we had a clean slate after the reform and were badly damaged. We could have used that time to come together again and get back to the basics. Selling the hard work of the Zeelot years out without his consent was the worst thing we could have done for morale. At least these powergrabbers could have changed the name and shown a little respect lol.
|
Those 2 do not go together. IF you reformed with a clean slate then the guild was different than it was at that point. You can't say the people in the guild tossed away someone's hard work when Zeelot was the person that disbanded the guild in the first place and threw it away. This isn't to cause strife with people who took the same stance as you in this case...It's just injecting a bit of common sense into it. You guys blame leadership for making a decision that benefited people when they were thrown to the wolves without much explanation by the former guild leader.