Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this makes no sense at all.
We have said from day 1 there is no agreement without players agreeing to a punishment should agreement to be broken.
but this is a great way to paint us as villains here when
TMO, the pinnacle of raiding, cant handle missing out on some Efreetis while not recognizing that a real deal, something clearly defined that holds guilds accountable is still currently not in place. Classy.
A. We did not break the original agreement, and once it was broken a new one needed to be forged with real tangible accountability ( GM enforced )
B. We left OoA up last week and then he died but no one had a shit storm about that
A couple people chimed in they wouldnt kill Overseer but still no word about support for GM punishment should deal be broken.
It is unfortunate that TMO cannot see the forest past the trees.
|
It's not about painting anyone a villain. We don't give a shit if it was Taken, IB, Europa of BDA (If it was BDA, I'd just make an RNF about Chest).
The fact that we didn't cry about it when the OoA died kinda evidences how little we give a shit about Nobles to any extent. But, as long as every other guild is apparently starting to treat them as FFA (at least the top tier Class-R's and IB) we might as well join the fun until something is in place.
In fact, just do this, GM's enforce no killing OoA and nobles go on FFA/Class-R/Class-C like the rest of the server.
Til that happens - happy hunting.