Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.
In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.
|
this makes no sense at all.
We have said from day 1 there is no agreement without players agreeing to a punishment should agreement to be broken.
but this is a great way to paint us as villains here when
TMO, the pinnacle of raiding, cant handle missing out on some Efreetis while not recognizing that a real deal, something clearly defined that holds guilds accountable is still currently not in place. Classy.
A. We did not break the original agreement, and once it was broken a new one needed to be forged with real tangible accountability ( GM enforced )
B. We left OoA up last week and then he died but no one had a shit storm about that
A couple people chimed in they wouldnt kill Overseer but still no word about support for GM punishment should deal be broken.
It is unfortunate that TMO cannot see the forest past the trees.