Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Loraen said that the entity trained should determine who is responsible--or at least whether it would be deemed a raid violation or not.
Thus, since 30 bda got trained and 30 bda are a raid then one intentional train by person in guild X should constitute guild action and raid interference.
Dolic
|
Would you say the presence of guild leadership at an event constitutes a guild event, since guild officers are understood to be guild officers 24/7, always representing and responsible for their guild? It's not like we're talking about 4 people who happen to be tagged in a guild just hanging out and one of them does something stupid. Although, even if we were, an argument could pretty easily be made that since the group is composed entirely of members of a guild, they, too, are representing said guild, and accountable as representatives of that guild for their actions, right?
I don't care about the train or any of this anymore, I'm just interested philosophically since you're bringing legal arguments into the discussion