Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckwalk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Curious as to why you think agency wouldn't apply. The master is liable for servants acts within the scope of employment or in the case of intentional torts, when force is used to further the master's business/interests.
Seems like BDA would have an argument atleast.
|
1. For one, intentional criminal acts are outside the scope as you point out. Exceptions have been made in some states but not as broad ones as you may be suggesting. Mostly they are limited to bouncers at at a nightclub / bar, and so forth.
2. Second, who is he an agent of. Is he an agent of the fear clear with 4 people. And are they agents of TMO the organization. They were clearing out some monkeys for their 9th alts, when no raid mobs where up. So even if you can claim his act of retaliation was somehow as an agent of the 5 other TMO there, it is then difficult to say that that small group were agents of TMO on official TMO employment. Such a view would make every activity in the game fall within furthering whatever persons guild's interests.
Dolic