View Single Post
  #4  
Old 06-17-2014, 12:45 PM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No point in trying to reason with Lord Bob. They will continue to FTE without logic or fairness.

Don't really need them as part of the agreement anyways. They still haven't even legally killed a raid mob yet right?
Well here is an interesting point. Is Genocidal Tendencies or that Baker's Guild on the raid roster? No, because they haven't legally killed anything. Should Cats Who Say Meow have a decision in how IB and TMO handle FTEs and training in VP? Probably not. Should that trading guild in EC have a seat on the committee that decides Noble agreements? Doubtful, since they aren't a raiding guild.

Every major raiding guild has agreed to this arrangement and it would appear that a guild that does not successfully raid major targets is trying to strong arm the server for misbegotten moralistic reasons. I question the legitimacy of this claim. Do we need to try to coerce Lord Bob to see reason or does their argument not hold weight against 99% of the successful raiding guilds?
__________________