Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezalor
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a critique of the toothlessness of affidavits, not a critique of the veracity of the charges. Can you tell the difference?
So, you're assuming all allegations of misconduct by Blackwater must be false because those with the executive power to reign in Blackwater haven't already done so?
If you really can't see the flaws in that logic, allow me add you to my ignore list.
|
Poor wounded king defense then? Go ahead and add me, it doesn't matter to me.
These are toothless affidavits, that are not credible, and don't have charges that can be proved. How do you show in a court of law that Prince hates Muslims?
I posted a link to the affidavit because it proved the case clearly that these are political stunts not documents that we would file to end an injustice.
My point that is if an executive who can prevent a crime, does nothing with knowledge a crime is occurring, then they are culpable morally if not legally.
Obama is supposed to be "hope and change" but if such horrors are happening now, then they are his responsibilities. it doesn't look like he believes that murder of federal agents, rapes of American soldiers and all the innocent civilian deaths are worthy of note.
Even if he was somehow unable to cancel a contract that most every federal contact auditor can cancel with a simple memo, don't you think he would have made a speech or maybe even invited Blackwater over for a beer summit?