Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamalam
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Examples which he will conveniently choose to ignore, like so many others before him. I'm just about done with these trolls, as fun as it's been. They are barely even trying anymore. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
I am not in the group laying claim to "mountains of evidence and examples" in support of my position then choosing to post none.
You guys still haven't addressed the stomach or tings like the pleiotropy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiotropy
From Wiki. - Pleiotropy of genes impacts the evolutionary rate of genes and allele frequencies. Traditionally, it has been expected that evolutionary rate of genes is related negatively with pleiotropy; however, this has not been clearly found in empirical studies.[7][8] Contrary to this traditional expectation, it has been theoretically demonstrated that evolutionary rate should be positively related with pleiotropy by itself as the square root of gene pleiotropy;[9] however, other effects of pleiotropy may explain why a clear relationship between evolutionary rate and gene pleiotropy has not been found at the genomic scale.[9]
I love how the idea is pooed on by saying no emperical studies have "clearly "shown the negative effects but then provide how theoretically evolution demonstrates this being something positive.