Quote:
Originally Posted by Lron
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No. Just....no.
That is false analogy and a logical fallacy.
Evolution as an analogy of the alphabet provides evidence for every ascending letter and how A became B, how B became C how C became B so on and so forth all the way up to "X".
If there was no good reason and no evidence to support M turning into N then the scientific theory would be picked apart by other scientists in the field and either scrapped completely or left sitting at that crossroad. It would never become a scientific theory.
|
No, I got it right, X is variable or in this situation the idea. A + B = C is the answer, therefor it would = X. SUCK IT